The mass grooming, rape, abuse, drugging and murder of hundreds of thousands of white girls by predominantly Pakistani gangs is the biggest tragedy in British history. For decades, girls across the country have been put through unimaginable horror, and the authorities have not only turned a blind eye but also blamed the girls for their abuse.
On the 16th of July, Baroness Louise Casey conducted a report into group-based child exploitation and abuse. The report highlighted the severity and scale of the grooming gangs and the systemic failings of the authorities to address the sexual exploitation around the country.
The report highlighted the fact that the gangs are majority Pakistani, putting concrete data behind what most of the country already knew and giving legitimacy to advocates who otherwise would be dismissed as being “racist” or “dogwhistling”. It has also pressured the government to launch a national inquiry into the gangs, hopefully moving us one more step toward getting justice for the victims.
Here are five key takeaways from the Casey Report.
Calls for a National Inquiry
The report has recommended a full national inquiry into child sexual exploitation in England and Wales. The inquiry would be managed by an independent commission with “full statutory inquiry powers” to compel witnesses to provide evidence. All requests for evidence must be “time-limited, targeted, and proportionate”.
The report also recommends a national police operation to review outstanding cases of child sexual exploitation (CSE). The inquiry would also review the failures of local services to conduct local investigations in the future.
The report has led to the government announcing a national inquiry, despite voting against one only a few months before.
The Failure to Report Ethnicity
Using data from Greater Manchester, South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire, the report found “disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds amongst suspects for group-based child sexual exploitation”.
The report states that the significant number of Asian perpetrators in local reviews and high-profile cases warrants examination, and that more research is needed to understand the causes of Asian overrepresentation in group-based child sexual exploitation.
That said, the ethnicity of perpetrators is still “shied away from despite being a question for many years” and not recorded in two-thirds of cases.
The report also notes that a “significant proportion” of active cases “involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK”.
Strengthening Existing Laws
The report states that taxi licenses are much less strict in some areas than others. This creates a loophole where drivers can apply for a license in one area but then operate in another. The report urges the Department for Transport to close this loophole and implement more thorough licensing standards.
The report also says that too many cases of child sexual exploitation are dropped or downgraded to lesser charges. In some cases, the victims are viewed and treated as “child prostitutes” despite the term “child prostitution” being removed from law in 2015 and replaced with “child sexual exploitation”.
The report recommends tightening the law in England and Wales so adults who have sex with a child under 16 are always charged with rape, calls for any convictions of the victims to be overturned, and proposes removing victims’ criminal records, especially where crimes were “committed under coercion”.
Under-reporting and Limited Data
The report notes data collection flaws, suggesting the problem's scale is understated.
Data from the Complex and Organised Child Abuse Dataset found 700 offences of group-based child sexual exploitation in 2023. Still, this data is unlikely to reflect the true scale of child sexual exploitation.
The report stresses that group-based child sexual exploitation is under-reported, partially due to “confusing and inconsistently applied legal definitions”, adding that “the concept of ‘grooming gangs’, while well-known to the public, is not captured clearly in any official data set”.
Misrepresenting the Evidence
The report notes that journalists, academics, and others widely misrepresented the 2020 Home Office paper.
Making a prediction based on limited data, the paper concluded “it seems most likely that the ethnicity of group-based CSE offenders is in line with CSA more generally and with the general population, with the majority of offenders being White”.
This line was used to spread the narrative that the prevalence of Asian grooming gangs was sensationalised, biased or untrue, even though research and data in the paper did not support such a conclusion.
The report lists examples of misinformation, including a Guardian headline reading “most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men” and a UCL article saying “a powerful modern racial myth has been exploded” and “research has found that group-based offenders are most commonly White”.
.
Thank you ladies for your support for our girls and women. I worked in child protection services for 20 years and saw so many horrors directly linked to foreign men and White English girls, the youngest was 9 years old. However, another case, same issues except mother of child was actually pimping her 8 year old daughter out to many Somalian men and Nigerians. Mother was a heroin addict and the men were dealers, who cuckood her accommodation.
I have gone from a liberal to a race realist. I was bullied and run out of the profession that I loved.
I would not say "Pakistanis are overrepresented in grooming gangs." I would say that British men have never engaged in industrial-scale multi-generational sexual degradation of girls of any nation. I would also say that the girls of England have been utterly betrayed by the police and politicians of their nation. Police feared being called racist while innocent girls were brutally physically and sexually enslaved? Calling names is one of the things enemies do. Real men and real leaders ignore name calling and act bravely to protect the innocent.
That Charles would rather sell knighthoods to rich muslims and call himself "defender of faith" while generations of his nation's innocent girls are raped foreign invaders shows that he is no king. He makes Bad King John look like Richard the Lion Hearted in comparison.