There is no way that women and girls should have to put up with being harassed, demeaned and potentially worse while engaging in such activities as having a picnic in a park. This is an outrage and must be stopped. Thank you, Jess, for your determination, strength and bravery in creating and running Women's Safety Initiative to help keep all us females safe in the UK.
Absolutely but stop acting like immigrants are to blame every 1 should be treated equally to judge all based on a few is a straight up compositional fallacy it doesn't prove your argument wrong but you need provide evidence for claim
Every country in Europe that has allowed mass immigration (mass not even an adequate enough word for the sheer volume) has seen a huge rise in sexual assault and violent crime.
The stats are everywhere and it’s beyond dispute.
Look at Epping. Illegal immigrant in the country for less than a week, sexually assaulted school age girls.
Two tier policing in full effect, pretty soon people will have no choice but to police their own community and the result will not be pretty.
There's evidence from other countries like Sweden and Denmark where data around ethnicity and sexual crimes is recorded. Not so in the UK so figures are hard to come by. Journalist Alex Phillips has made a documentary for The New Culture Forum about the topic which you can watch here. It provides plenty of evidence: https://youtu.be/JJ58WG3hd2g?si=uDJgPvyYnhDetz01
Do you care about fighting harassment from non-immigrant men? I don't understand the focus on harassment by a specific group (which is a form of discriminatory harassment in itself) – why not just fight all harassment?
You're using data to justify racial profiling with this campaign. And the original poster doesn't mean immigrants from the US, Australia, etc. These are all technically immigrant men in the UK, all proven to be capable of harassment, but her campaign is clearly not targeting those immigrant men.
This is as if a man made a campaign to stop fatal car hit-and-runs by women specifically. Even if the data supported him (which it doesn't btw), why not just campaign against all hit-and-runs? Why target women drivers?
Shame on all of you for using your "feminist / woman protection" campaign to veil a racist and discriminatory campaign. In 2025 of all things. I say this as a woman myself and would never target harassment by immigration status, even if it had been all immigrant men to harass me (which is the opposite case).
All of you have serious anti-racist self-educating to do, to believe this blatantly racist logic is okay to post so publicly and not see the serious logical fallacies underlying it. You all show how much work "civilised UK society" still has to do in 2025.
I wish you no harassment and am sorry this happened to you, but targeting a specific demographic in your anti-harassment campaign is out of line and blatantly discriminatory. Look up Emmett Till, history has ample precedent of this.
The mass rape in the UK, in the hundred of thousands of white girls, by mostly men of Pakistani origin, is testament to the fact that this is a problem that needs to be addressed. Of course I'm against harassment by anyone. But there are valid reasons to focus, in addition to focusing on harassment in general, on specific groups where there is little to no existing data and start gathering and analysing it and asking questions. Avoiding this issue is why we ended up with the rape of the hundreds and thousands of girls in the first place. People turned a blind eye for fear of being called racist. We need to learn from this to stop and prevent future things like this happening. Silence, ignorance and denial are not the answer.
Elitist views like this are the reason why we’re in this mess. Crimes against women are being perpetrated en mass by people who should not be there to commit the crime in the first place.
The culture, beliefs and conditions under which they believe allow them to do as they please to women are polar opposites to the ones held in the west.
If a mass movement of foxes broke into a chicken pen, would you advocate that foxes shouldn’t be the focus, without considering all other animals that pose a danger to chickens?
"Shame on all of you for using your "feminist / woman protection" campaign to veil a racist and discriminatory campaign"
Shame on you for being a woman and deriding other women for wanting to protect women, girls, and the country.
"I say this as a woman myself and would never target harassment by immigration status, even if it had been all immigrant men to harass me"
You're literally proving why this is needed. Your loyalty is with foreign people, not women, not British people - it's precisely what led to the current state of the country. Indeed, this is what feminism is in 2025.
"Look up Emmett Till"
Look up Charlene Downes, history has ample precedent of this.
A YouTube video is not a valid citation. YouTube content often misrepresents data or omits the full truth. In academia, citing a YouTube video would be heavily criticized, as it lacks the rigor of academic papers. Saying "we can't trust the elites" is like saying "we can't trust professionals who do this for a living."
Do you apply this mentality elsewhere? Would you say, "I can't trust a doctor's diagnosis for a heart transplant"? If not, why cite a YouTube video, especially one with a known right-wing bias? These videos often have an agenda and cherry-pick information to push a narrative. Why trust such sources over credible expertise?
For me the video is a very credible source. A quick Google search will bring up other credible sources you may wish to take a look at if you are in any further doubt as to the truth of figures related to this issue. The numbers don’t lie.
Okay - Foreign nationals accounted for 28%–34% of convictions for “sexual assault on a female” in England and Wales in 2024, while making up about 10.9% of the population. For “rape of a female over 16”, foreign nationals comprised a quarter of convictions. When unknown or withheld nationality convictions are included, the rate could be as high as 22% for total sexual offences. The conviction rate for foreign nationals for sexual assault on a female was 5.75 per 100,000, compared to 1.77 per 100,000 for British citizens, indicating a rate 2.24 times higher among foreign nationals. Adjusting for working-age population, it remains about 1.5 times higher. Certain migrant groups (e.g., individuals from Afghanistan and Eritrea) were found to be over 20 times more likely to be convicted of sexual offences compared to British citizens. A Swedish government study found that 59.2% of offenders convicted of rape from 2000–2015 had an immigrant background. Another statistical analysis found that 36.9% of convicted individuals and 69.5% of control group members were Swedish-born with two Swedish-born parents, suggesting a disproportionate representation of immigrants among those convicted for rape. All sourced from government data. Happy now?
Leave citations for academic journals. You only need to see the news, read newspapers to see that illegal migrants are committing an awful lot of crime, but let's play it your way, please find a source which disproves that the migrant population is massively overrepresented in sex crimes.
I don't buy into the crime argument but I can sympathise where your coming from more immigrants means the housing crisis occurs and in a free market that wouldn't be an issue but Britain is a secular democracy not a libtertarian country if you allow to many in the short run due bad governmental policies reducing the housing permits it allows for a rise in the price of housing that being said the crime argument is utter bollox
"The few" have a tendency to be anything up to 25 times (depending on their country of origin) likely to commit sexual crimes (against women and /or men, some are not fussy), all the while being treated more leniently in legal practise if not in law.
This should be accepted as merely embracing a foreign culture, should it?
I believe you're getting emotional because this page doesn't cite a single statistic. It doesn't even show R coefficients, nor does it account for confounding factors like SES or over-policing.
Even then, correlation doesn't imply causation, and ethnic minorities aren't a monolith. Indians may be closer to Bengalis and Pakistanis, but Roma, Nigerians, and Somalis are distinct. What specific ethnicities are involved, and why is this happening? These questions need to be addressed with facts, not personal experiences.
Nonwhite immigration into White countries is a problem because of it dispossesses and biologically erases Whites. That’s the overall problem, there are many other sub problems. Like what these British White women object to.
Nothing you said there made any sense whites historically were not a homogenous ethnic group even if you got rid of the browns that mentality will create it so even whites are non whites because of puritanism.
It makes no sense as well any 1 who aware of reality would want skilled immigrants not a white ethno state tell me was the middle ages the beacon of high culture no it's the industrial revolution that benefitted heavily from migration and upwards mobility.
I told you — "white" isn't a valid term. That’s not me trying to divide; it's just historical reality. Go back even 400 years and try telling the English that the Irish are “one of theirs.” Go back 2,000 years and tell the Romans that the Nordics are part of their ethnic group. It doesn’t hold.
As for how skilled migration opens jobs — it’s because these migrants bring highly desired skillsets.
And I can already guess your counter: “But what about native talent?”
That assumes talent is a static resource — which it’s not. Talent is a growing pool, not a fixed one. That’s not how economics work.
As for other cultures being “shitholes,” blame the colonizers — blame the whites, who colonized them. And blame the Fabian Marxists, who spread Marxist ideology throughout the Third World.
If you actually did a historical analysis, you’d see that when Indians and Africans gained independence, many revolutionary leaders sided with the Soviets — who sold them the lie of total equality in every aspect of life. That’s why so many of these nations struggled — not because of the people, but because of the toxic ideological baggage they were handed by Marxist influence.
But I doubt you’ll respond with any common sense anyway.
I mean I don't want to blame white guys but who do I blame if the shoe fits wear it if India wasn't colonized they wouldn't in a 3rd world state the soviet union couldn't shill them lies about the workers revolution and those countries wouldn't be poor and you would have less Indian immigration your dream world your own race stopped happening
I agree that communism is a scourge, but the idea that you can blame Whites for that is ridiculous. There’s tons of nonwhite communists. Practically every primitive tribe is practicing some kind of communism. Whites have done a ton to advance free market principles, I note you don’t give any credit to us for that.
"if India wasn't colonized they wouldn't in a 3rd world state"
India is a regional power thanks to the British colonizing them. The fact that India is still a street shitting anthill made out of garbage is because of the inhabitants, not the British colonizing the place. The reason India has 1.4 billion people is advanced farming techniques given to them by the White man, same as to why you have railroads, and medicine.
"As for other cultures being “shitholes,” blame the colonizers — blame the whites, who colonized them."
The Antiwhite blames White people for the shortcomings of nonwhites. This is immoral and psychotic.
Countries that were colonized typically are further ahead than their neighbors who are not. Typically, these people benefited greatly from Colonization.
Also, whatever you think of Colonization from 200 years ago, wanting to harm Whites of today for an interpretation of history is some truly vicious wackjobery. It's also a standard you only hold White people to, because you're Antiwhite. Ditto your fabian socialist talking point.
"And I can already guess your counter: “But what about native talent?”
That assumes talent is a static resource — which it’s not. Talent is a growing pool, not a fixed one. That’s not how economics work."
Guess again, little Antiwhite. Even if nonwhites were better than Whites. Even if we could import more talented nonwhites, I would still oppose it, because I want the civilizations Whites build for our progeny, not so we can import other bipeds from around the world.
“As for how skilled migration opens jobs — it’s because these migrants bring highly desired skillsets.”
Nonwhite Antiwhite still trying to convince me that White people need shitholers from shithole countries. If these shitholers were so valuable, they wouldn’t be fleeing their dumps of origin, that they created with their genetic instinct.
Whites created the West with our genetic instinct. Nonwhites are not needed or wanted. Nonwhites are being imported against the wishes of the White population. This will be changing, they will be going back, so that Whites have a future.
The Founders of American knew that White people were those of European descent, as they penned it into the first Naturalization law in the USA. And we Whites went on to create the most powerful country in the history of the world. GFY Antiwhite.
Hahah, Whites created the industrial revolution. Like we created just about everything else that is attributed to “humanity”. We have no need for nonwhites. It’s amusing watching you try to convince me that we do. Me thinks nonwhites need Whites far more than the other way around.
"whites historically were not a homogenous ethnic group"
Whites built the USA into the most powerful country in the world. We are an ethnic group, we share the same culture, religion, language, and Blood. GFY for trying to tell me I dont get to have my identity.
👏👏👏 I applaud the Women’s Safety Initiative for the incredible and important work they are doing in Europe to protect native-born women from the advances and violence of immigrant men. I want to make some things clear about the Women’s Safety Initiative here. First off, no the Women’s Safety Initiative is not racist or xenophobic. This organization has nothing to do with white supremacy or hating immigrants. As their website shows, women of color and women from immigrant backgrounds have also been victimized by immigrant men from the third world. Nor is anyone here saying immigration is a bad thing. Where it becomes a problem is when there is TOO MUCH of it and from very different cultures with lax laws and no expectation they will assimilate or obey the laws of or integrate into the culture of, the host country. That’s the problem! These men come from the very different parts of the world where for the most part, women remain second-class citizens.
Therefore they see no problem with attacking, sexually harassing, sexually assaulting, raping, or brutally murdering native-born British women or women in other European countries. Yes, there is indeed sexual violence by native-born men against native-born women. No one here is denying or ignoring that. But there is plenty of attention on that as their should be. It is sexual violence against native-born women by foreigners that is being ignored and in some cases, covered-up by the press and European governments in the name of political correctness and not wanting to come off as racist or xenophobic. Let’s be clear here, legitimate racism or xenophobia in Britain is disgusting and is to be condemned and hate crimes against people of color and immigrants should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
But that’s NOT the point here. The problem with these men is NOT their skin color, national origin, ethnicity, religion, or immigration status. The problem with these men is their behavior and internal moral compass. Mass immigration is very, very bad for Britain and Europe as a whole. British and European women in particular have taken the brunt of immigrant crime. As have working-class people, Jews, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ people, and children.
Go away, Noah, with your mealy mouth, you liberals are the reason our women, children & men have to suffer & die at the hands of savages who should never have been allowed to come here, they have their own countries, which they can terrorise to their hearts' content, they have no right to invade ours.
“The problem with these men is NOT their skin color, national origin, ethnicity, religion, or immigration status. The problem with these men is their behavior and internal moral compass.” That moral compass is determined by national origin, ethnicity, and religion. It’s different from and incompatible with yours.
Good summary. The silence and bullying among the bien pensants on both sides of the Atlantic were astounding. I remember the looks of horror on my human rights colleagues’ faces when I suggested that mass migration from the middle east seemed to have something to do with this. An unspeakable fact.
I stand with the women of Britain. Good for you Women and girls and Men and Boys that have come out to support them. No woman should ever be treated like they do under Sharia Law. Or for that matter by your politicians. You are not second class citizens. I’m praying for you. We stand by you🙏🙏🙏🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
as a british woman, i relate to this so much. it’s honestly sad how something as simple as sitting in a park can end up making you feel unsafe, the link between immigration and women’s safety isn’t an easy thing to talk about, but ignoring it doesn’t change the reality. i really respect what you’re building with WSI, we need spaces where women can be honest about what we’re experiencing without being dismissed.
There is obviously an elephant in the room that the Government is keen to stifle honest debate on, by rule of Law and imprisonment.
Note that even Reform have stated that they will not be bringing in ICE style raids, and forced deportations.
But this goes deeper, it is the lack of respect by entire generations. We all have seen gangs of ferals that openly carry out raids in broad daylight knowing they are untouchable as they escape on e-bikes. Those that have never been employed, no social skills, yet the State owes them.
So while there are real problems being caused, many are home grown.
This is a good initiative, but it should be followed by women voting en masse for a party which is determined to call a halt to immigration of unskilled, uneducated and backward people.
Who is this piece aimed at? By that I mean who do you expect to protect you? The Police? The same Police who collaborated with Pakistani R-pe gangs? Or is it White British men that you want to make the streets safer? Get used to this harassment, working class men have been sounding the alarm for years and all we got was attacks from progressives like the one the wrote this article. When white children from lower income demographic were being brutalised you all turned a blind eye. Now it's your turn. Enjoy the country that "Progressivism" created!
Beautiful! I fully support this. These foreign invaders need to be removed from western culture - where they don’t belong. How dare they treat our women with such disrespect - as mere sex toys. 😡
Oh grow up mate. My very masculine, bearded, rugby front row forward, motor cyclist husband supports this initiative. He doesn't think any bloke of amy colour or creed should harrass women. Perhaps you could thimk about agreeing with him instead of slagging off women.
Exactly. Who isn't sick of these intersectionality groups claiming to be the greater victim? There are bigger dynamics at play here with these invaders.
What are you talking about? Are British men being followed home, having sexual comments made to them, having their park picnics disrupted by these illegal migrant men? No, didn't think so.
Yes, maybe more violent crimes are committed against men. By men. Do we have statistics about homegrown British men being attacked by what you call ‘illegals’? Genuine question - I don’t know. I haven’t re-read the piece you were responding to, but I think it was specifically about attacks by illegal immigrant males on women & girls, so why do you make this about you? Every damn thing women do, we get whataboutery from men. As to the sort of women that men want, I am absolutely uninterested in that. I am a feminist and I am not growing old alone, I am in the company of many others. And I am wide awake, thank you.
Feminism has never cared about women's safety. Everything feminism has done has made women more vulnerable and unsafe. To be a feminist is to put women in danger.
Traditional gender roles and social etiquette were set up specifically to maximise women's safety by enforcing clear boundaries between men and women and creating a set of socialising and courtship behaviours that everyone understood, so everyone knew where they stood at all times.
Traditional gender roles and etiquette not only policed men's behaviour, but also policed women's behaviour too - recognising that BOTH sexes are driven by powerful impulses that can often lead to disaster for everyone concerned.
Feminism got rid of all of these protections and boundaries, and promoted a ridiculous culture where women were defined as having no agency and no personal responsibility - yet the freedom to walk about in underwear and have casual, drunken, hedonistic sex on a whim.... while men were defined as the only ones with agency and personal responsibility, and as sexual predators (by default) whose mere gaze was is act of sexual assault and who have oppressed women throughout the ages through the act of sex, which when men do it is rape.
The attitude of western men towards western women (even the ones falling over drunk in the streets every night dressed like prostitutes) is still very much rooted in traditionalism. Western men still respect women's boundaries, even those western women do not themselves.
Feminist women celebrate pop stars pole dancing in front of children at Hollywood award shows, or performing sex acts in pop music videos. Feminist women take their kids (toddlers!) to see sex shows now and they whoop and cheer as the performers strip naked and writhe around on the floor in bondage gear.
Feminist / progressive women have defined women as less than animals. It is only men's continued adherence to traditional attitudes towards women that gives western women (I'm talking about the feminist variety) any veneer of respectability and humanity.
But people from non western cultures, take feminism's creation (the modern empowered sexually liberated woman) at FACE VALUE. They accept feminism for what it actually preaches, and what it has reduced western women to. And they act accordingly. Their abhorrent treatment of women and girls in the west reflects feminist ideology and its rejection of traditional gender roles and morals, and how that redefines women as nothing more than objects.
Feminism will never provide the answer to women's safety in the west, because feminism (and progressivism in general) is the problem. Only when western women reject feminist ideology en masse, and dismantle 100 years of feminist changes to culture and the law, and go back to forming a strong alliance with ordinary, working, non-woke men again will western women be able to live safely again.
These are the very men feminists have undermined, attacked, ostracised, demonised and bled dry for the last century. These men (the only decent men in society) can do very little to help protect the safety of western women and girls until western women free them from the doghouse, apologise to them for a century of abuse, and agree to ditch feminism and instead form a new partnership with them again, based on equal trust, loyalty and respect.
My heart and mind are open. As a prosecutor, I’m well aware men are victims of violent crimes, but not particularly at the hands of migrants. We are letting our girls and women down. We may as well hand these men a 9 year old girl as they land on our shores. Most British men believe this is a cause worth fighting for. Why don’t you?
Unlike you, I believe that men’s lives matter as much as women’s lives do. In the USA, men are violent crime victims two times more often as men. You are only looking at one aspect of violence against men, not the entire picture. Feminists like you do that all the time.
As long as women (and mangina men) turn their backs on the welfare of men, they shouldn’t be surprised when they learn that feminists made sure there is vastly more funding for breast cancer than prostate cancer.
You object to us campaigning to make women and girls safe from rape because some blokes in the States get beaten up? If you’re that concerned about violence against males, do something about it instead of whining to a group of ‘feminists’. Boo fucking hoo! Here’s a suggestion, why don’t you call it ‘Men’s Safety Initiative’. You’re welcome.
What will say if your husband gets prostate cancer, then learns that your fellow feminists made sure that there is vastly more funding for breast cancer?
For God's sake! Not everything has to be about men: just stop with your whataboutery. We are allowed to have our own concerns, you know, and attempt to do something about them.
If a woman like Barbara Harmer could fly a BA 747 or Concorde just as well as a man why shouldn't she get paid the same? Why should I have been denied the right to study Technical Drawing at school because I have a vagina instead of a penis? Why couldn't I be a draughtsperson or architect? There is no reason! So how the hell does that say "I think men have no rights and should be subjected to violence"? IT DOESN'T MORON.
There’s a long history of right-wing women-centric organizations, and it has nothing to do with feminism - in fact, most have been explicitly opposed to it. See: Mothers’ movement which opposed American participation in WW2
There is no way that women and girls should have to put up with being harassed, demeaned and potentially worse while engaging in such activities as having a picnic in a park. This is an outrage and must be stopped. Thank you, Jess, for your determination, strength and bravery in creating and running Women's Safety Initiative to help keep all us females safe in the UK.
Keep speaking, Anna Leggett. Do not stop!
And yet you are happy that men and boys must put up with being criminally abused. You are a sexost bigoted manhater.
Absolutely but stop acting like immigrants are to blame every 1 should be treated equally to judge all based on a few is a straight up compositional fallacy it doesn't prove your argument wrong but you need provide evidence for claim
Every crime or harassment committed by a foreigner is 100% avoidable, and the consequences of immigration are immense. Stop simping for foreigners.
Every country in Europe that has allowed mass immigration (mass not even an adequate enough word for the sheer volume) has seen a huge rise in sexual assault and violent crime.
The stats are everywhere and it’s beyond dispute.
Look at Epping. Illegal immigrant in the country for less than a week, sexually assaulted school age girls.
Two tier policing in full effect, pretty soon people will have no choice but to police their own community and the result will not be pretty.
No it isn't you cock sucker show me the stats if a migrant does it he's even more punished stop lying
... it literally is, if there were no immigration there's be zero crimes committed by foreigners.
A brief glance at your profile says enough. You're blocked.
Afghans commit rape 20 times more than British men. Official stats, so put that in your pipe and smoke it, you tedious shill.
There's evidence from other countries like Sweden and Denmark where data around ethnicity and sexual crimes is recorded. Not so in the UK so figures are hard to come by. Journalist Alex Phillips has made a documentary for The New Culture Forum about the topic which you can watch here. It provides plenty of evidence: https://youtu.be/JJ58WG3hd2g?si=uDJgPvyYnhDetz01
Do you care about fighting harassment from non-immigrant men? I don't understand the focus on harassment by a specific group (which is a form of discriminatory harassment in itself) – why not just fight all harassment?
You're using data to justify racial profiling with this campaign. And the original poster doesn't mean immigrants from the US, Australia, etc. These are all technically immigrant men in the UK, all proven to be capable of harassment, but her campaign is clearly not targeting those immigrant men.
This is as if a man made a campaign to stop fatal car hit-and-runs by women specifically. Even if the data supported him (which it doesn't btw), why not just campaign against all hit-and-runs? Why target women drivers?
Shame on all of you for using your "feminist / woman protection" campaign to veil a racist and discriminatory campaign. In 2025 of all things. I say this as a woman myself and would never target harassment by immigration status, even if it had been all immigrant men to harass me (which is the opposite case).
All of you have serious anti-racist self-educating to do, to believe this blatantly racist logic is okay to post so publicly and not see the serious logical fallacies underlying it. You all show how much work "civilised UK society" still has to do in 2025.
I wish you no harassment and am sorry this happened to you, but targeting a specific demographic in your anti-harassment campaign is out of line and blatantly discriminatory. Look up Emmett Till, history has ample precedent of this.
The mass rape in the UK, in the hundred of thousands of white girls, by mostly men of Pakistani origin, is testament to the fact that this is a problem that needs to be addressed. Of course I'm against harassment by anyone. But there are valid reasons to focus, in addition to focusing on harassment in general, on specific groups where there is little to no existing data and start gathering and analysing it and asking questions. Avoiding this issue is why we ended up with the rape of the hundreds and thousands of girls in the first place. People turned a blind eye for fear of being called racist. We need to learn from this to stop and prevent future things like this happening. Silence, ignorance and denial are not the answer.
It is not racist to call out such behaviour.
The rape of a teenager in Falkirk is appalling but the rapist and the defence counsel logic is worse
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgem84/p/uk-legal-system-and-victims?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3kosw6
That's a powerful post. That twisted logic makes me sick. I don't know how those types of people can sleep at night.
Blah, blah.
Stats from The New Culture Forum documentary by Alex Philips: Foreign nationals & sex crime stats - key figures:
🔹 UK: Foreigners 3.5× more likely to be arrested for sex crimes (The Times, 2024)
🔹 UK: Up to 1 in 4 convictions involve non-Brits (Migration Central, 2023)
🔹 Sweden: 58% of rapists had immigrant background (SVT, 2018)
🔹 Germany: Asylum seekers = 2% of population, 16% of sex assault suspects (Federal Police, 2017)
🔹 UK: Afghans/Eritreans 20× more likely to be convicted than Brits (Migration Central, 2024)
Elitist views like this are the reason why we’re in this mess. Crimes against women are being perpetrated en mass by people who should not be there to commit the crime in the first place.
The culture, beliefs and conditions under which they believe allow them to do as they please to women are polar opposites to the ones held in the west.
If a mass movement of foxes broke into a chicken pen, would you advocate that foxes shouldn’t be the focus, without considering all other animals that pose a danger to chickens?
Spot on! Well said.
👏🏼
"Shame on all of you for using your "feminist / woman protection" campaign to veil a racist and discriminatory campaign"
Shame on you for being a woman and deriding other women for wanting to protect women, girls, and the country.
"I say this as a woman myself and would never target harassment by immigration status, even if it had been all immigrant men to harass me"
You're literally proving why this is needed. Your loyalty is with foreign people, not women, not British people - it's precisely what led to the current state of the country. Indeed, this is what feminism is in 2025.
"Look up Emmett Till"
Look up Charlene Downes, history has ample precedent of this.
A YouTube video is not a valid citation. YouTube content often misrepresents data or omits the full truth. In academia, citing a YouTube video would be heavily criticized, as it lacks the rigor of academic papers. Saying "we can't trust the elites" is like saying "we can't trust professionals who do this for a living."
Do you apply this mentality elsewhere? Would you say, "I can't trust a doctor's diagnosis for a heart transplant"? If not, why cite a YouTube video, especially one with a known right-wing bias? These videos often have an agenda and cherry-pick information to push a narrative. Why trust such sources over credible expertise?
You are a troll.
Bullshite.
You are lucky that this country still allows free speech. Only just.
For me the video is a very credible source. A quick Google search will bring up other credible sources you may wish to take a look at if you are in any further doubt as to the truth of figures related to this issue. The numbers don’t lie.
I can't speak for other areas but in the UK most crimes are by whites the more criminal areas are because there poorer off even then it's a minority.
I can't speak for other countries nor do I wish to Britain is where I'm from I don't live in America or Sweden I love in the UK
Okay - Foreign nationals accounted for 28%–34% of convictions for “sexual assault on a female” in England and Wales in 2024, while making up about 10.9% of the population. For “rape of a female over 16”, foreign nationals comprised a quarter of convictions. When unknown or withheld nationality convictions are included, the rate could be as high as 22% for total sexual offences. The conviction rate for foreign nationals for sexual assault on a female was 5.75 per 100,000, compared to 1.77 per 100,000 for British citizens, indicating a rate 2.24 times higher among foreign nationals. Adjusting for working-age population, it remains about 1.5 times higher. Certain migrant groups (e.g., individuals from Afghanistan and Eritrea) were found to be over 20 times more likely to be convicted of sexual offences compared to British citizens. A Swedish government study found that 59.2% of offenders convicted of rape from 2000–2015 had an immigrant background. Another statistical analysis found that 36.9% of convicted individuals and 69.5% of control group members were Swedish-born with two Swedish-born parents, suggesting a disproportionate representation of immigrants among those convicted for rape. All sourced from government data. Happy now?
Check the stats out for sexual crimes in the UK in this video and I think there's a post there too: https://substack.com/@mattgoodwin/note/c-129528223?r=3udl34
Leave citations for academic journals. You only need to see the news, read newspapers to see that illegal migrants are committing an awful lot of crime, but let's play it your way, please find a source which disproves that the migrant population is massively overrepresented in sex crimes.
I don't buy into the crime argument but I can sympathise where your coming from more immigrants means the housing crisis occurs and in a free market that wouldn't be an issue but Britain is a secular democracy not a libtertarian country if you allow to many in the short run due bad governmental policies reducing the housing permits it allows for a rise in the price of housing that being said the crime argument is utter bollox
Eviden ce from Britain? Please
"The few" have a tendency to be anything up to 25 times (depending on their country of origin) likely to commit sexual crimes (against women and /or men, some are not fussy), all the while being treated more leniently in legal practise if not in law.
This should be accepted as merely embracing a foreign culture, should it?
“Protected characteristics” ☠️
Being treated equally is another part of the problem not being addressed.
Well this error of thinking is a compositional fallacy it's innocent till proven guilty
I believe what I observe, and right now I believe you're getting emotional.
I believe you're getting emotional because this page doesn't cite a single statistic. It doesn't even show R coefficients, nor does it account for confounding factors like SES or over-policing.
Even then, correlation doesn't imply causation, and ethnic minorities aren't a monolith. Indians may be closer to Bengalis and Pakistanis, but Roma, Nigerians, and Somalis are distinct. What specific ethnicities are involved, and why is this happening? These questions need to be addressed with facts, not personal experiences.
Lived experience and realities quickly change perception.
You can demand figures and question everything, but even the hardest leftists are seeing problems.
But it's fine, we can agree to disagree!
Nonwhite immigration into White countries is a problem because of it dispossesses and biologically erases Whites. That’s the overall problem, there are many other sub problems. Like what these British White women object to.
Nothing you said there made any sense whites historically were not a homogenous ethnic group even if you got rid of the browns that mentality will create it so even whites are non whites because of puritanism.
It makes no sense as well any 1 who aware of reality would want skilled immigrants not a white ethno state tell me was the middle ages the beacon of high culture no it's the industrial revolution that benefitted heavily from migration and upwards mobility.
Tell me again how Whites can benefit from nonwhites, who create shithole civilizations amongst their own kind, coming to live in White civilization.
I told you — "white" isn't a valid term. That’s not me trying to divide; it's just historical reality. Go back even 400 years and try telling the English that the Irish are “one of theirs.” Go back 2,000 years and tell the Romans that the Nordics are part of their ethnic group. It doesn’t hold.
As for how skilled migration opens jobs — it’s because these migrants bring highly desired skillsets.
And I can already guess your counter: “But what about native talent?”
That assumes talent is a static resource — which it’s not. Talent is a growing pool, not a fixed one. That’s not how economics work.
As for other cultures being “shitholes,” blame the colonizers — blame the whites, who colonized them. And blame the Fabian Marxists, who spread Marxist ideology throughout the Third World.
If you actually did a historical analysis, you’d see that when Indians and Africans gained independence, many revolutionary leaders sided with the Soviets — who sold them the lie of total equality in every aspect of life. That’s why so many of these nations struggled — not because of the people, but because of the toxic ideological baggage they were handed by Marxist influence.
But I doubt you’ll respond with any common sense anyway.
I mean I don't want to blame white guys but who do I blame if the shoe fits wear it if India wasn't colonized they wouldn't in a 3rd world state the soviet union couldn't shill them lies about the workers revolution and those countries wouldn't be poor and you would have less Indian immigration your dream world your own race stopped happening
I note that you shift between “Whites don’t exist” and “Whites are to blame” depending on what works for the Antiwhite argument you are forwarding.
I agree that communism is a scourge, but the idea that you can blame Whites for that is ridiculous. There’s tons of nonwhite communists. Practically every primitive tribe is practicing some kind of communism. Whites have done a ton to advance free market principles, I note you don’t give any credit to us for that.
"if India wasn't colonized they wouldn't in a 3rd world state"
India is a regional power thanks to the British colonizing them. The fact that India is still a street shitting anthill made out of garbage is because of the inhabitants, not the British colonizing the place. The reason India has 1.4 billion people is advanced farming techniques given to them by the White man, same as to why you have railroads, and medicine.
"As for other cultures being “shitholes,” blame the colonizers — blame the whites, who colonized them."
The Antiwhite blames White people for the shortcomings of nonwhites. This is immoral and psychotic.
Countries that were colonized typically are further ahead than their neighbors who are not. Typically, these people benefited greatly from Colonization.
Also, whatever you think of Colonization from 200 years ago, wanting to harm Whites of today for an interpretation of history is some truly vicious wackjobery. It's also a standard you only hold White people to, because you're Antiwhite. Ditto your fabian socialist talking point.
"And I can already guess your counter: “But what about native talent?”
That assumes talent is a static resource — which it’s not. Talent is a growing pool, not a fixed one. That’s not how economics work."
Guess again, little Antiwhite. Even if nonwhites were better than Whites. Even if we could import more talented nonwhites, I would still oppose it, because I want the civilizations Whites build for our progeny, not so we can import other bipeds from around the world.
“As for how skilled migration opens jobs — it’s because these migrants bring highly desired skillsets.”
Nonwhite Antiwhite still trying to convince me that White people need shitholers from shithole countries. If these shitholers were so valuable, they wouldn’t be fleeing their dumps of origin, that they created with their genetic instinct.
Whites created the West with our genetic instinct. Nonwhites are not needed or wanted. Nonwhites are being imported against the wishes of the White population. This will be changing, they will be going back, so that Whites have a future.
The Founders of American knew that White people were those of European descent, as they penned it into the first Naturalization law in the USA. And we Whites went on to create the most powerful country in the history of the world. GFY Antiwhite.
Hahah, Whites created the industrial revolution. Like we created just about everything else that is attributed to “humanity”. We have no need for nonwhites. It’s amusing watching you try to convince me that we do. Me thinks nonwhites need Whites far more than the other way around.
"whites historically were not a homogenous ethnic group"
Whites built the USA into the most powerful country in the world. We are an ethnic group, we share the same culture, religion, language, and Blood. GFY for trying to tell me I dont get to have my identity.
Spineless lol
Moslem Totalitarian Supremacists have to go away and, if they hold British passlorts, to jail.
👏👏👏 I applaud the Women’s Safety Initiative for the incredible and important work they are doing in Europe to protect native-born women from the advances and violence of immigrant men. I want to make some things clear about the Women’s Safety Initiative here. First off, no the Women’s Safety Initiative is not racist or xenophobic. This organization has nothing to do with white supremacy or hating immigrants. As their website shows, women of color and women from immigrant backgrounds have also been victimized by immigrant men from the third world. Nor is anyone here saying immigration is a bad thing. Where it becomes a problem is when there is TOO MUCH of it and from very different cultures with lax laws and no expectation they will assimilate or obey the laws of or integrate into the culture of, the host country. That’s the problem! These men come from the very different parts of the world where for the most part, women remain second-class citizens.
Therefore they see no problem with attacking, sexually harassing, sexually assaulting, raping, or brutally murdering native-born British women or women in other European countries. Yes, there is indeed sexual violence by native-born men against native-born women. No one here is denying or ignoring that. But there is plenty of attention on that as their should be. It is sexual violence against native-born women by foreigners that is being ignored and in some cases, covered-up by the press and European governments in the name of political correctness and not wanting to come off as racist or xenophobic. Let’s be clear here, legitimate racism or xenophobia in Britain is disgusting and is to be condemned and hate crimes against people of color and immigrants should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
But that’s NOT the point here. The problem with these men is NOT their skin color, national origin, ethnicity, religion, or immigration status. The problem with these men is their behavior and internal moral compass. Mass immigration is very, very bad for Britain and Europe as a whole. British and European women in particular have taken the brunt of immigrant crime. As have working-class people, Jews, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ people, and children.
Go away, Noah, with your mealy mouth, you liberals are the reason our women, children & men have to suffer & die at the hands of savages who should never have been allowed to come here, they have their own countries, which they can terrorise to their hearts' content, they have no right to invade ours.
“The problem with these men is NOT their skin color, national origin, ethnicity, religion, or immigration status. The problem with these men is their behavior and internal moral compass.” That moral compass is determined by national origin, ethnicity, and religion. It’s different from and incompatible with yours.
Native born?! Ffs what bullshite
Read what you have written. Does it really say anything? Have you added any positive (or otherwise) input into the conversation?
You're not as funny as when ya on the telly.
And the prize for Most Original Comment goes to.... not you, I'm afraid.
And in answer to your response I refer you to my first comment.
Garliiiccc
bread!
Still not original, is it? Try harder. Er.. don't bother.
Good idea. Hope this initiative succeeds. What's been done to all our countries is criminal.
Thank you!
A much-needed initiative and I hope it succeeds.
Do not use Uber taxis ... attacks on women are brushed under the carpet
Are you allied with any Continental groups? The attacks in Köln on new years eve 2015 were a huge turning point.
That was horrifying. Wrote about it. Still can't get my head around this. https://open.substack.com/pub/georgem84/p/silence-is-virtue-the-official-guide?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3kosw6
Good summary. The silence and bullying among the bien pensants on both sides of the Atlantic were astounding. I remember the looks of horror on my human rights colleagues’ faces when I suggested that mass migration from the middle east seemed to have something to do with this. An unspeakable fact.
I stand with the women of Britain. Good for you Women and girls and Men and Boys that have come out to support them. No woman should ever be treated like they do under Sharia Law. Or for that matter by your politicians. You are not second class citizens. I’m praying for you. We stand by you🙏🙏🙏🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
as a british woman, i relate to this so much. it’s honestly sad how something as simple as sitting in a park can end up making you feel unsafe, the link between immigration and women’s safety isn’t an easy thing to talk about, but ignoring it doesn’t change the reality. i really respect what you’re building with WSI, we need spaces where women can be honest about what we’re experiencing without being dismissed.
Great job advocating for women’s safety and our right to speak out.
How do I join the WSI please?
Scroll to the top and subscribe to Jess Gill. She also has the WSI there to subscribe to.
https://womensafety.uk/join/
There is obviously an elephant in the room that the Government is keen to stifle honest debate on, by rule of Law and imprisonment.
Note that even Reform have stated that they will not be bringing in ICE style raids, and forced deportations.
But this goes deeper, it is the lack of respect by entire generations. We all have seen gangs of ferals that openly carry out raids in broad daylight knowing they are untouchable as they escape on e-bikes. Those that have never been employed, no social skills, yet the State owes them.
So while there are real problems being caused, many are home grown.
What like 1st-2,3rd generation Muslim immigrants?
Treating benefits as a life style choice cuts across race.
This is a good initiative, but it should be followed by women voting en masse for a party which is determined to call a halt to immigration of unskilled, uneducated and backward people.
Who is this piece aimed at? By that I mean who do you expect to protect you? The Police? The same Police who collaborated with Pakistani R-pe gangs? Or is it White British men that you want to make the streets safer? Get used to this harassment, working class men have been sounding the alarm for years and all we got was attacks from progressives like the one the wrote this article. When white children from lower income demographic were being brutalised you all turned a blind eye. Now it's your turn. Enjoy the country that "Progressivism" created!
Beautiful! I fully support this. These foreign invaders need to be removed from western culture - where they don’t belong. How dare they treat our women with such disrespect - as mere sex toys. 😡
“Doi” sounds very western 🤣
Look to your liberal ,woke sisters not to us toxically masculine men to care about you…women asked for, and enabled and got…this hell.
Oh grow up mate. My very masculine, bearded, rugby front row forward, motor cyclist husband supports this initiative. He doesn't think any bloke of amy colour or creed should harrass women. Perhaps you could thimk about agreeing with him instead of slagging off women.
I suggest reading about Mothers’ movement
https://magane.substack.com/p/elizabeth-dilling-mothers-movement
Immigration is also unsafe for MEN. Ditch the feminism, and you will have credibility.
You don't have to be a feminist to care about women's safety.
You have to be a humanitarian to realize that men’s lives matter as much as women’s lives do. Feminism is the opposite of humanitarianism.
How many men are being raped? UK had over 70,000 REPORTED rapes last year. The highest per capital figure in the world.
Frank, on this occasion the enemy of your enemy is your friend.
The other side of the fatherlessness epidemic coin is this...
Exactly. Who isn't sick of these intersectionality groups claiming to be the greater victim? There are bigger dynamics at play here with these invaders.
Thank you. You are entirely correct. Men are sick of the feminist in-group bias.
What are you talking about? Are British men being followed home, having sexual comments made to them, having their park picnics disrupted by these illegal migrant men? No, didn't think so.
Men are violent crime victims two times more often than women.
There are a growing number of women that value and respect men. Those are the women men want. Feminists will grow old alone
The illegals damage BOTH sexes. Wake up and smell the coffee.
And the title of the piece was what immigration means for women, and still you make it about men? What a skill!
Yes, maybe more violent crimes are committed against men. By men. Do we have statistics about homegrown British men being attacked by what you call ‘illegals’? Genuine question - I don’t know. I haven’t re-read the piece you were responding to, but I think it was specifically about attacks by illegal immigrant males on women & girls, so why do you make this about you? Every damn thing women do, we get whataboutery from men. As to the sort of women that men want, I am absolutely uninterested in that. I am a feminist and I am not growing old alone, I am in the company of many others. And I am wide awake, thank you.
Your “company of many others” will not include a man.
I believe that men’s lives matter as much as women’s lives do. You obviously disagree.
Feminism has never cared about women's safety. Everything feminism has done has made women more vulnerable and unsafe. To be a feminist is to put women in danger.
Traditional gender roles and social etiquette were set up specifically to maximise women's safety by enforcing clear boundaries between men and women and creating a set of socialising and courtship behaviours that everyone understood, so everyone knew where they stood at all times.
Traditional gender roles and etiquette not only policed men's behaviour, but also policed women's behaviour too - recognising that BOTH sexes are driven by powerful impulses that can often lead to disaster for everyone concerned.
Feminism got rid of all of these protections and boundaries, and promoted a ridiculous culture where women were defined as having no agency and no personal responsibility - yet the freedom to walk about in underwear and have casual, drunken, hedonistic sex on a whim.... while men were defined as the only ones with agency and personal responsibility, and as sexual predators (by default) whose mere gaze was is act of sexual assault and who have oppressed women throughout the ages through the act of sex, which when men do it is rape.
The attitude of western men towards western women (even the ones falling over drunk in the streets every night dressed like prostitutes) is still very much rooted in traditionalism. Western men still respect women's boundaries, even those western women do not themselves.
Feminist women celebrate pop stars pole dancing in front of children at Hollywood award shows, or performing sex acts in pop music videos. Feminist women take their kids (toddlers!) to see sex shows now and they whoop and cheer as the performers strip naked and writhe around on the floor in bondage gear.
Feminist / progressive women have defined women as less than animals. It is only men's continued adherence to traditional attitudes towards women that gives western women (I'm talking about the feminist variety) any veneer of respectability and humanity.
But people from non western cultures, take feminism's creation (the modern empowered sexually liberated woman) at FACE VALUE. They accept feminism for what it actually preaches, and what it has reduced western women to. And they act accordingly. Their abhorrent treatment of women and girls in the west reflects feminist ideology and its rejection of traditional gender roles and morals, and how that redefines women as nothing more than objects.
Feminism will never provide the answer to women's safety in the west, because feminism (and progressivism in general) is the problem. Only when western women reject feminist ideology en masse, and dismantle 100 years of feminist changes to culture and the law, and go back to forming a strong alliance with ordinary, working, non-woke men again will western women be able to live safely again.
These are the very men feminists have undermined, attacked, ostracised, demonised and bled dry for the last century. These men (the only decent men in society) can do very little to help protect the safety of western women and girls until western women free them from the doghouse, apologise to them for a century of abuse, and agree to ditch feminism and instead form a new partnership with them again, based on equal trust, loyalty and respect.
My heart and mind are open. As a prosecutor, I’m well aware men are victims of violent crimes, but not particularly at the hands of migrants. We are letting our girls and women down. We may as well hand these men a 9 year old girl as they land on our shores. Most British men believe this is a cause worth fighting for. Why don’t you?
Unlike you, I believe that men’s lives matter as much as women’s lives do. In the USA, men are violent crime victims two times more often as men. You are only looking at one aspect of violence against men, not the entire picture. Feminists like you do that all the time.
As long as women (and mangina men) turn their backs on the welfare of men, they shouldn’t be surprised when they learn that feminists made sure there is vastly more funding for breast cancer than prostate cancer.
You object to us campaigning to make women and girls safe from rape because some blokes in the States get beaten up? If you’re that concerned about violence against males, do something about it instead of whining to a group of ‘feminists’. Boo fucking hoo! Here’s a suggestion, why don’t you call it ‘Men’s Safety Initiative’. You’re welcome.
Men in the UK get beaten up too. An Englishwoman pointed out female-on-male domestic violence, and your fellow feminists chased her out of the UK.
The government is no more responsive to men, and equal rights for men, than you feminists are.
Plan on growing old in a house full of cats.
Happily married, with kids and a house full of dogs. Stop trolling ladies and get a life of your own!
What will say if your husband gets prostate cancer, then learns that your fellow feminists made sure that there is vastly more funding for breast cancer?
For God's sake! Not everything has to be about men: just stop with your whataboutery. We are allowed to have our own concerns, you know, and attempt to do something about them.
You feminists make everything about women.
We weren’t talking about America. I’m not a feminist. Grow up!
Hear, hear Donna.
Oh, you followed all that then? I went down a bit of a rabbit hole.
Frank, you’re talking bollocks. Men are not being raped!
Try opening your mind and your heart. Men are also victims of violent crimes.
Nobody is saying they aren't. You seem to be saying that women deserve to be raped.
No, just calling out feminist women on their absence of concern for men.
If a woman like Barbara Harmer could fly a BA 747 or Concorde just as well as a man why shouldn't she get paid the same? Why should I have been denied the right to study Technical Drawing at school because I have a vagina instead of a penis? Why couldn't I be a draughtsperson or architect? There is no reason! So how the hell does that say "I think men have no rights and should be subjected to violence"? IT DOESN'T MORON.
Dear feminist dipshit: You only show concern for women, and have no concern for the welfare of men.
Be sure to feed your 10 cats today. femtard.
There’s a long history of right-wing women-centric organizations, and it has nothing to do with feminism - in fact, most have been explicitly opposed to it. See: Mothers’ movement which opposed American participation in WW2